Topic summary
78%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Judge Ruling results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 1,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,254 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,682 of 13,918 topics). This Federal Judge Ruling is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Federal Judge Ruling
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Judge Ruling attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Judge Ruling vs sitewide
Federal Judge Ruling attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.