Topic summary
0%10 analyzed articles/videos6,483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 3,723 hits. Analysis detected 25,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,400 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (9,560 of 13,023 topics). This Federal Funding is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Federal Funding
Topic details
Total words: 26,400
Article count: 10
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Funding vs sitewide
Federal Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.