Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Employee Health Benefits results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 14,963 topics). This Federal Employee Health Benefits is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Employee Health Benefits
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Employee Health Benefits attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Employee Health Benefits vs sitewide
Federal Employee Health Benefits attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.