Topic summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video1,985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Charges And Investigations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,206 hits. Analysis detected 6,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of â 49% (6,743 of 13,018 topics). This Federal Charges And Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Federal Charges And Investigations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Charges And Investigations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Charges And Investigations vs sitewide
Federal Charges And Investigations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.