Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Benefits results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 4,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (12,648 of 13,018 topics). This Federal Benefits is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Federal Benefits
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠3%Federal Benefits (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 9,768
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Benefits attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Benefits vs sitewide
Federal Benefits attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos