Topic summary
51%2 analyzed articles/videos2,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Aid results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 9,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (10,199 of 12,830 topics). This Federal Aid is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Federal Aid
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Aid attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Aid vs sitewide
Federal Aid attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.