Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Hit And Run results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Circular Reasoning, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (22,511 of 24,545 topics). This Fatal Hit And Run is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Fatal Hit And Run
Topic details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos