Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fast Food Chains results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,365 of 24,569 topics). This Fast Food Chains is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Fast Food Chains
Topic details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos