Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fashion Scandals results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 778 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Fashion Scandals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fashion Scandals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 778
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles778 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos