Topic summary

⁠76%1 analyzed article/video776 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Faculty Conduct results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (7,812 of 21,014 topics). This Faculty Conduct is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.

Faculty Conduct

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Back-To-School	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠63%	Faculty Conduct (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,104

Article count: 1

Authors

Anna Miller

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Faculty Conduct attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Faculty Conduct vs sitewide

Faculty Conduct attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

From Columbia to UCLA, faculty activists remain in the classroom⁠^58%

American Thinker⁠^97%By Anna Miller⁠^76%7/30/2026, 9:00:00 PM