Topic summary
50%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faculty And Staff results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,501 of 21,191 topics). This Faculty And Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Faculty And Staff
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Faculty And Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Faculty And Staff vs sitewide
Faculty And Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.