Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video6,098 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Executive Assistants results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 897 hits. Analysis detected 9,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (12,979 of 13,018 topics). This Executive Assistants is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.

Executive Assistants

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠1%	Executive Assistants (selected)	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 24,392

Article count: 1

Authors

Sophie Elmhirst

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Executive Assistants attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Executive Assistants vs sitewide

Executive Assistants attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant⁠^8%

The Guardian⁠^80%By Sophie Elmhirst⁠^0%5/28/2026, 4:00:54 AM