Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evidence Sharing results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (5,558 of 12,143 topics). This Evidence Sharing is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Evidence Sharing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,328
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Evidence Sharing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Evidence Sharing vs sitewide
Evidence Sharing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos