Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etta James results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (9,963 of 21,744 topics). This Etta James is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Etta James
Topic details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos