Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Case results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 2,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,782 of 16,562 topics). This Epstein Case is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Epstein Case
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠53%Epstein Case (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Epstein Case attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Epstein Case vs sitewide
Epstein Case attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos