Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Banking Investigation results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,556 of 22,283 topics). This Epstein Banking Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Epstein Banking Investigation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos