Topic summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Violations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 1,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,075 of 21,908 topics). This Environmental Violations is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Environmental Violations
Topic details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst