Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enrollment Growth results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 538 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,671 of 23,593 topics). This Enrollment Growth is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Enrollment Growth
Topic details
Total words: 2,540
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos