Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enes Kanter Freedom results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 1,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,518 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,360 of 24,545 topics). This Enes Kanter Freedom is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Enes Kanter Freedom
Topic details
Total words: 1,518
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.9%19.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos