Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Energy Contracts results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,258 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,583 topics). This Energy Contracts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Energy Contracts
Topic details
Total words: 1,258
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos