Topic summary

⁠90%1 analyzed article/video392 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Endangered Species Protection results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,746 of 16,486 topics). This Endangered Species Protection is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.

Endangered Species Protection

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠72%	Endangered Species Protection (selected)	5%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,176

Article count: 1

Authors

Patrick Whittle

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Endangered Species Protection attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Endangered Species Protection vs sitewide

Endangered Species Protection attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Endangered right whales could wait almost a decade for new US protections⁠^73%

AP News⁠^54%By Patrick Whittle⁠^38%7/22/2026, 5:11:57 PM