Topic summary
â 54%1 analyzed article/video1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emissions Trading results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 44% (11,767 of 20,926 topics). This Emissions Trading is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Emissions Trading
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emissions Trading attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emissions Trading vs sitewide
Emissions Trading attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.