Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Moreno results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 4,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,953 of 24,545 topics). This Emily Moreno is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Emily Moreno
Topic details
Total words: 2,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.9%37.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.4%41.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 11.7%11.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos