Topic summary
3%2 analyzed articles/videos1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Process results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 2,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,082 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (11,871 of 12,143 topics). This Electoral Process is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Electoral Process
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Electoral Process attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Electoral Process vs sitewide
Electoral Process attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.