Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Prediction Markets results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 4,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (12,087 of 13,257 topics). This Election Prediction Markets is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Election Prediction Markets
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Prediction Markets attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Prediction Markets vs sitewide
Election Prediction Markets attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.