Topic summary
41%1 analyzed article/video1,400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Investigation results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 3,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (10,786 of 12,980 topics). This Election Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Election Investigation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Investigation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Investigation vs sitewide
Election Investigation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.