Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These El Nino Phenomenon results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,687 of 22,971 topics). This El Nino Phenomenon is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
El Nino Phenomenon
Topic details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos