Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video2,310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eco Sabotage results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 424 hits. Analysis detected 3,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (12,397 of 12,443 topics). This Eco Sabotage is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Eco Sabotage
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Survival Stories1%
⁠0%Gender Identity1%
⁠1%Eco Sabotage (selected)1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 9,240
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Eco Sabotage attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Eco Sabotage vs sitewide
Eco Sabotage attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos