Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Duty To Innovate results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 684 faulty-reasoning hits from 572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,070 of 24,545 topics). This Duty To Innovate is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Duty To Innovate
Topic details
Total words: 572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles572 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.1%17.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 24.3%24.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos