Topic summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 1,370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Duma results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 604 hits . Analysis detected 4,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,407 of 23,998 topics). This Duma is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Duma
Topic details
Total words: 5,480
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst