Topic summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dublin results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,826 of 24,545 topics). This Dublin is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Dublin
Topic details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos