Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Approval Process results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 2,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,786 of 22,275 topics). This Drug Approval Process is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Drug Approval Process
Topic details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos