Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dress Code results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (9,207 of 22,261 topics). This Dress Code is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Dress Code
Topic details
Total words: 2,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos