Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drag Shows results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 2,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,472 of 24,561 topics). This Drag Shows is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Drag Shows
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠33%Drag Shows (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos