Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,297 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Donor Influence In Schools results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 6,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (7,160 of 13,018 topics). This Donor Influence In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.

Donor Influence In Schools

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠45%	Donor Influence In Schools (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,838

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Donor Influence In Schools attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Donor Influence In Schools vs sitewide

Donor Influence In Schools attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

How Epstein and Maxwell used an elite Midwest arts school to prey on girls⁠^62%

NPR⁠^85%By Ava Berger⁠^0% Scott Neuman⁠^0%2/19/2026, 10:25:51 AM