Topic summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos4,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,003 hits. Analysis detected 12,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,480 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (11,311 of 12,187 topics). This Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization vs sitewide
Dobbs V Jackson Womens Health Organization attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.