Topic summary
71%1 analyzed article/video1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diversity In Stem results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,902 of 16,562 topics). This Diversity In Stem is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Diversity In Stem
Topic details
Total words: 3,099
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Diversity In Stem attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Diversity In Stem vs sitewide
Diversity In Stem attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos