Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disability Insurance results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 2,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (6,498 of 24,545 topics). This Disability Insurance is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Disability Insurance
Topic details
Total words: 2,720
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos