Topic summary

⁠80%1 analyzed article/video491 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Digital Markets Act results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anchoring Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,473 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,747 of 15,392 topics). This Digital Markets Act is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.

Digital Markets Act

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Alameda County	1%
⁠63%	Digital Markets Act (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,473

Article count: 1

Authors

Steve Dent

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Digital Markets Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Digital Markets Act vs sitewide

Digital Markets Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Europe hits Google with $1 billion fine for boxing-out rivals⁠^64%

Engadget⁠^39%By Steve Dent⁠^41%7/23/2026, 11:17:59 AM