Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Deterrence results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 2,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,786 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 22,488 topics). This Deterrence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Deterrence
Topic details
Total words: 3,786
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst