Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Deployment results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Loss Aversion , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 47 hits . Analysis detected 214 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Deployment is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Deployment
Topic details
Total words: 1,772
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst