Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Department Of War results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 375 faulty-reasoning hits from 524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,311 topics). This Department Of War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Department Of War
Topic details
Total words: 524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles524 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos