Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Party Infighting results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,834 of 22,331 topics). This Democratic Party Infighting is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Democratic Party Infighting
Topic details
Total words: 2,624
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos