Topic summary

⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,998 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Democratic Party Factions results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 8,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,994 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (6,607 of 14,624 topics). This Democratic Party Factions is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.

Democratic Party Factions

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠55%	Democratic Party Factions (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,994

Article count: 1

Authors

Andrew Prokop

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Democratic Party Factions attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Democratic Party Factions vs sitewide

Democratic Party Factions attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

How the Michigan Senate primary activated every bitter Democratic grudge⁠^77%

Vox⁠^50%By Andrew Prokop⁠^53%7/21/2026, 10:00:00 AM