Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Del Mar City Council results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (18,155 of 22,504 topics). This Del Mar City Council is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Del Mar City Council
Topic details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos