Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defective Work results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (7,965 of 22,140 topics). This Defective Work is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Defective Work
Topic details
Total words: 1,924
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos