Topic summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debunking Viral Claims results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 1,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,389 of 16,855 topics). This Debunking Viral Claims is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Debunking Viral Claims
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Debunking Viral Claims attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Debunking Viral Claims vs sitewide
Debunking Viral Claims attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.