Topic summary

⁠61%1 analyzed article/video6,166 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Debate On Objectivity In Academia results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,984 hits. Analysis detected 14,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,498 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (10,896 of 13,006 topics). This Debate On Objectivity In Academia is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.

Debate On Objectivity In Academia

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠17%	Debate On Objectivity In Academia (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 18,498

Article count: 1

Authors

Paul Boghossian

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Debate On Objectivity In Academia attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Debate On Objectivity In Academia vs sitewide

Debate On Objectivity In Academia attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

A Crisis in the Humanities⁠^40%

Quillette⁠^62%By Paul Boghossian⁠^65%7/16/2026, 1:01:45 AM