Topic summary
31%1 analyzed article/video896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hearn results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,335 of 21,582 topics). This David Hearn is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
David Hearn
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Hearn attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Hearn vs sitewide
David Hearn attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.