Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Data Ethics results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,966 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,261 topics). This Data Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Data Ethics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,966
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos